Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGADE, Tine
dc.identifier.citationContemporary Arab affairs, 2017, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 187-206en
dc.descriptionPublished online: 27 Apr 2017en
dc.description.abstractResearch on violent spillovers in civil war has often exaggerated the potential for conflict contagion. The case of Lebanon is a counter-example. Despite the massive pressure of the horrific war in next-door Syria, it has, against all odds, remained remarkably stable – despite the influx of more than 1 million Syrian refugees and almost complete institutional blockage. This paper, based on ethnographic research and semi-structured interviews from Lebanon, studies the determination to avoid a violent spillover into Lebanon from the perspective of the country’s Sunni Islamists. Recent trends in the scholarly literature have shown that Islamists are not inherently revolutionary, nor always dogmatists, and often serve many social purposes at home. The main argument is that the Syrian war has not been imported into Lebanon; instead, the Lebanese conflict is externalized to Syria. Lebanon’s conflicting factions, including the Islamists, have found the costs of resorting to violence inside Lebanon to be too high. Even those Lebanese Sunnis who have crossed the borders to fight in Syria do so because of domestic reasons, that is, to fight against Hezbollah on Syria soil, where they can do so without risking an explosion of the Lebanese security situation. Sectarianism, in the sense of opposition to Hezbollah and the Lebanese Shia, is the main driver of radicalization for Lebanese Sunnis.en
dc.publisherUniversity of California Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofContemporary Arab affairsen
dc.titleLimiting violent spillover in civil wars : the paradoxes of Lebanese Sunni jihadism, 2011–17en

Files associated with this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record