Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLESSA KERSTENETZKY, Celia
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-03T14:18:51Z
dc.date.available2017-07-03T14:18:51Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationCambridge journal of economics, 2009, Vol. 33, No. 2, p. 193-209en
dc.identifier.issn0309-166X
dc.identifier.issn1464-3545
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/47110
dc.descriptionFirst published online: 18 November 2008en
dc.description.abstractIn the context of a critique of the exclusive use of the rational choice approach in economics, the article presents a pluralistic interpretation of the Popperian notion of situational logic as an alternative approach. This is proposed in connection with a reading of the rationality principle as a rationalisability principle. I argue that this principle can accommodate an ample array of rational responses to different situations and even rationalise the multiple responses that are given to the same situation. I present some examples to illustrate the relevance of the proposed interpretation.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofCambridge journal of economicsen
dc.relation.isbasedonhttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/5188
dc.titlePlural situational logic : the rationa(lisabi)lity principleen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/cje/ben049
dc.identifier.volume33en
dc.identifier.startpage193en
dc.identifier.endpage209en
dc.identifier.issue2en
dc.description.versionThe article is a revised version of the author’s EUI PhD thesis, 1998


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record