Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTRANTIDIS, Aris
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-30T14:11:18Z
dc.date.available2018-01-30T14:11:18Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationRepresentation : journal of representative democracy, 2016, Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 149-161en
dc.identifier.issn0034-4893
dc.identifier.issn1749-4001
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/50908
dc.descriptionPublished online: 28 Feb 2017en
dc.description.abstractIs age a suitable case for electoral quotas on the same grounds invoked for women in politics? If affirmative action should not be arbitrarily applied to a few social groups, we must specify the conditions that could serve as a benchmark which a group must pass in order to qualify for its application. Drawing from the literature on women in politics, this article sets up empirical indicators to examine the political under-representation of younger and older age groups: whether the age-related pattern of political under-representation is linked to stereotypes and bias that negatively affect its engagement in politics, and whether these age groups face special issues that give them a unique perspective, which only those who directly experience them can fully advocate in decision-making fora. Affirmative action raises questions about the boundaries of identity, the limits of politics as a vehicle for social change and the meaning of electoral choice.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis (Routledge)en
dc.relation.ispartofRepresentation : journal of representative democracyen
dc.titleIs age a case for electoral quotas? : applying a benchmark for affirmative action in politicsen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00344893.2017.1291446
dc.identifier.volume52en
dc.identifier.startpage149en
dc.identifier.endpage161en
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue3en


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record