dc.contributor.author | ESPOSITO, Fabrizio | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-02-06T11:48:25Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-02-06T11:48:25Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Oeconomia, 2017, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 375-406 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 2113-5207 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2269-8450 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1814/51253 | |
dc.description | Published online: 1 September 2017 | en |
dc.description | Les contenus d’Œconomia sont mis à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons
Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International. | en |
dc.description.abstract | This article claims that the behavioural turn in Law and Economics vindicates the approach of the pre-turn New Haven School. Available accounts of the turn offer useful methodological insights but are unconvincing, because they tend to oversimplify the literature. Building on these insights, the pre- and post-turn literature are reviewed. In so doing, three levels of analysis—normative, descriptive, and prescriptive— are distinguished. Comparing the two strands of literature shows that some pre-turn positions are more in accord with the post-turn literature than others. Importantly, the approach of the Chicago School— mainstream in the pre-turn literature—has been deeply influenced by the turn, whereas the one of the New Haven School—then subjacent—is substantially compatible with the post-turn mainstream positions. It follows, then, that the turn vindicates, at least theoretically, the approach of the New Haven School. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.relation.ispartof | Oeconomia | en |
dc.relation.uri | http://oeconomia.revues.org/2756 | en |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en |
dc.title | How the behavioural turn in law and economics vindicates the New Haven School | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.4000/oeconomia.2756 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 7 | en |
dc.identifier.startpage | 375 | en |
dc.identifier.endpage | 406 | en |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en |