Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDEHOUSSE, Renaud
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-14T10:31:11Z
dc.date.available2018-03-14T10:31:11Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationComparative European politics, 2016, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 20–35en
dc.identifier.issn1472-4790
dc.identifier.issn1740-388X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/52304
dc.descriptionPublished online 9 March 2015en
dc.description.abstractAt the beginning of this century, the European Union engaged in a discussion on the necessity to shift to softer modes of governance, less detrimental for state sovereignty, which prompted lively academic debates. But how much has actually changed in the day-to-day practice has not been systematically analysed, and the severe economic and financial crisis experienced by European countries has radically changed the conditions in which EU policies are elaborated. Reviewing recent evidence, this article questions the dichotomy between old and new governance and shows that the crisis has led to a ‘hardening’ of EU regulation in key policy areas, while in others the Commission has proved to be able to use its ‘soft powers’ in ways that buttressed its influence. As a result, the shift to soft governance has not been as radical as one might have thought.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherPalgrave Macmillanen
dc.relation.ispartofComparative European politicsen
dc.titleHas the European Union moved towards soft governance?en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1057/cep.2015.7
dc.identifier.volume14en
dc.identifier.startpage20en
dc.identifier.endpage35en
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue1en


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record