Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorREYNOLDS, Kara M.
dc.contributor.authorYANGUAS, Tatiana
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-06T09:40:56Z
dc.date.available2018-12-06T09:40:56Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1028-3625
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/59904
dc.description.abstractIn April 2017, a WTO panel ruled that China’s anti-dumping investigation into imports of dissolving cellulose pulp from Canada violated the WTO’s Anti-dumping Agreement. The panel found that China’s description of the parallel price trends of dumped imports and domestic products failed to explain their finding that the dumped imports caused the decline in domestic prices. The ruling perhaps should not have surprised anyone as the WTO had made similar findings in disputes involving two previous Chinese anti-dumping investigations. This paper explores to what degree “parallel price trends” can be used as a valid methodology to determine price depression, and whether it is the methodology itself that is problematic or China’s implementation of that methodology that has caused it to lose three disputes over the past five years.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUI RSCASen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2018/59en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesGlobal Governance Programme-324en
dc.relation.ispartofseries[Global Economics]en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subjectAnti-dumpingen
dc.subjectWTO disputeen
dc.subjectParallel price trenden
dc.subjectCellulose pulpen
dc.subject.otherTrade, investment and international cooperation
dc.titleChina–Cellulose Pulp : China’s quest to satisfy WTO panels and the appellate bodyen
dc.typeWorking Paperen


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record