Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHOEKMAN, Bernard M.
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-06T13:55:44Z
dc.date.available2018-12-06T13:55:44Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationGlobal governance, 2018, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 249-265
dc.identifier.issn1075-2846
dc.identifier.issn1942-6720en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/59987
dc.descriptionPublished online: 19 August 2018en
dc.description.abstractPublic procurement around the world tends to be heavily skewed toward local firms. This home bias has been falling in many countries, independent of whether states have agreed to binding disciplines on government procurement in a trade agreement. Extant research suggests that reciprocally negotiated market access commitments have not been very effective in inducing governments to buy more from foreign suppliers. In this article, I present data and review available research on home bias in procurement. I argue that the evidence suggests policy should put less emphasis on specific market access reciprocity through trade agreements in favor of a greater focus on learning about good procurement practices and principles, enhancing transparency and accountability, and pursuing pro-competitive policies more generally.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLynne Rienner Publishersen
dc.relation.ispartofGlobal governance
dc.subjectGovernment procurement
dc.subjectRegulatory cooperation
dc.subjectTrade agreements
dc.subjectGood practice
dc.subjectWTO
dc.subjectGovernment procurementen
dc.titleReducing home bias in public procurement : trade agreements and good governance
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1163/19426720-02402006
dc.identifier.volume24
dc.identifier.startpage249
dc.identifier.endpage265
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue2


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record