Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTITARENKO, Larissa
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-16T14:06:32Z
dc.date.available2019-05-16T14:06:32Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/62676
dc.description.abstractCircular mobility being interpreted as a fluid movement of people between countries presumes that it can bring benefits to all the parties involved. However, in regard to contemporary Belarus, circular migration and - broadly - circular mobility bring more problems than benefits. In the long-term perspective, Belarus, as a country of origin, seems to lose more than to gain even if there are some short-term benefits (such as remittances and decrease of potential unemployment pressure on the Belarusian economy). In what follows I explain the pluses and minuses of circular migration.en
dc.description.sponsorshipConsortium for Applied Research on International Migration (CARIM-East) is co-financed by the European University Institute and the European Union
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMigration Policy Centreen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCARIM-Easten
dc.relation.ispartofseriesExplanatory Notesen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2012/59en
dc.relation.urihttp://www.migrationpolicycentre.eu/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subjectCircular migration
dc.subjectEU
dc.titleCircular migration : Belarusen
dc.typeTechnical Reporten
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record