Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMARTIN, Philip
dc.contributor.authorRUHS, Martin
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-10T14:37:02Z
dc.date.available2019-09-10T14:37:02Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationInternational migration, 2019, Vol. 57, No. 6, pp. 80-90en
dc.identifier.issn0020-7985
dc.identifier.issn1468-2435
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/64064
dc.descriptionFirst published online: 6 August 2019en
dc.description.abstractThe Global Compacts on Migration (GCM) and Refugees (GCR) include policy recommendations that aim to increase opportunities for legal labour migration, improve protections for migrant workers, and provide refugees with ‘complementary pathways’ to enhanced protection via labour mobility. This paper explains why there are large gaps between these policy recommendations and the labour market policies and realities in the countries that host most of the world’s migrant workers. These gaps between ideals and realities are likely to limit the effective implementation of the GCM/GCR recommendations on labour migration. More ‘labour market realism‘ is needed to incrementally but effectively improve protections for migrant workers.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherInternational Organization for Migrationen
dc.relation.ispartofInternational migrationen
dc.relation.ispartofseries[Migration Policy Centre]en
dc.relation.isbasedonhttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/62065
dc.titleLabour market realism and the global compacts on migration and refugeesen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/imig.12626
dc.identifier.volume57
dc.identifier.startpage80
dc.identifier.endpage90
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.description.versionThe article is published version of EUI RSCAS WP; 2019/23


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record