Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLINDVALL, Johannes
dc.contributor.authorROTHSTEIN, Bo
dc.date.accessioned2006-12-15T11:46:49Z
dc.date.available2006-12-15T11:46:49Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.citationScandinavian political studies, 2006, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 47-63en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/6410
dc.descriptionFirst Published: 01 February 2006
dc.description.abstractFrom the 1930s to the 1980s, Swedish politics was based on the assumption that social change could be accomplished through a specific political and administrative process. National politicians decided the aims of policy, government commissions of inquiry engaged experts who compiled available knowledge, Parliament turned the resulting proposal into law, a civil service agency implemented the policy and local authorities put it into effect. This rationalistic model of social steering can be called `the strong state'. This article documents the fall of the strong state. It also argues that these changes to the output side of government have troubling im-plications for the operation of democracy. The reason is that the strong state model provided citizens with a reasonably clear idea of how public policies were – or should be – produced and implemented. As a result of the strong state's decline, the link from elections to policy is partly obscure, partly broken. The question for the future is whether the strong state will be replaced by some new model that provides the necessary focal points for debates on public policy, or whether stable norms will remain absent due to an inherently obscure division of labour within Sweden's policy-making and administrative structures.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleSweden : the fall of the strong stateen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1467-9477.2006.00141.x
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record