Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEILSTRUP-SANGIOVANNI, Mette
dc.identifier.citationInterest groups & advocacy, 2019, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 376–406en
dc.descriptionFirst Online: 24 May 2019en
dc.description.abstractWhy do some transnational advocacy groups adopt radical, confrontational tactics whereas others focus on ‘inside’ lobbying and information provision? Why do some advocacy groups appeal to large global audiences while others approach decision-makers behind closed doors? Bringing together interest group studies and population ecology theory, this article examines how population ecological dynamics affect strategic specialization among transnational advocate groups. I argue that increasing resource competition resulting from ‘organizational crowding’, along with the introduction of new legal and technological tools has led to growing strategic differentiation among transnational advocates, and has prompted a strategic division of labor whereby some groups (mainly larger, well-established and resource-rich groups) specialize in gaining political access and media attention, while others (mainly smaller, less established groups) focus on developing ‘niche’ agendas and strategies including, inter alia, radical protest, monitoring and enforcement, and litigation. I illustrate my argument with quantitative data and comparative cases from the realm of transnational environmental conservation advocacy.en
dc.publisherPalgrave Macmillan UKen
dc.relation.ispartofInterest groups & advocacyen
dc.titleCompetition and strategic differentiation among transnational advocacy groupsen

Files associated with this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record