When is human trafficking slavery or enslavement? : human trafficking at the intersection of human rights law and criminal law

Abstract

This thesis explores the international definitions of slavery, enslavement and human trafficking to determine if and when human trafficking is slavery. Using predominantly the legal method, the thesis argues that there is an overlap between the definitions, yet they are not synonymous. Furthermore, the principles of human rights law and criminal law are compared in the context of slavery and human trafficking. Although the systems can and do engage with each other, it is posited that in a criminal setting courts should be wary of relying on human rights jurisprudence to determine the substance of the criminal definition. This is because human rights are interpreted in an evolutive, teleological way, whereas criminal courts should be bound by the principle of legality. Human rights courts, on the other hand, could and should engage more with the contours of the definitions of human trafficking and slavery – not to determine criminal liability, but instead to produce a deeper, more nuanced understanding of the structures that render persons vulnerable to exploitation. In this way, the thesis asserts, a human rights approach could move beyond the current model, which is excessively oriented toward criminal investigation and punishment. Due to current challenges posed by conflict and post-conflict situations, the thesis ends by reflecting on the potential of human trafficking being prosecuted by the International Criminal Court as a crime against humanity. Although the possibility has found some support within academia, this thesis proposes that if and when human trafficking does amount to slavery and meets the other elements of crimes against humanity, it has and can be prosecuted. Some forms of human trafficking, as of all other acts constituting crimes against humanity, will, however, fall outside the scope of international criminal law.