Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGENSCHEL, Philipp
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-19T11:02:32Z
dc.date.available2019-11-19T11:02:32Z
dc.date.issued1997
dc.identifier.citationOrganization studies, 1997, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 603-622en
dc.identifier.issn0170-8406
dc.identifier.issn1741-3044
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/65066
dc.description.abstractThere is a stark contrast between the way industrial economics asks us to think about standard setting in telecommunications and the way standard-setting is actually organized. On the one hand, leading scholars maintain that standard setting is a natural monopoly. On the other hand, the number of standards organizations for telecommunications is quite large and there is no indication that this number will decrease. The paper analyzes how to resolve this discrep ancy. It argues that there are reasons to believe that the natural monopoly hypothesis is wrong. Under a certain set of conditions which are prevalent in international telecommunications, the distribution of standard setting to a multitude of competing standards organizations is both stable and efficient.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen
dc.relation.ispartofOrganization studiesen
dc.titleHow fragmentation can improve coordination : setting standards in international telecommunicationen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/017084069701800403
dc.identifier.volume18en
dc.identifier.startpage603en
dc.identifier.endpage622en
dc.identifier.issue4en


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record