Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGENSCHEL, Philipp
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-19T11:12:16Z
dc.date.available2019-11-19T11:12:16Z
dc.date.issued1997
dc.identifier.citationGovernance, 1997, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 43-66en
dc.identifier.issn0952-1895
dc.identifier.issn1468-0491
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/65067
dc.description.abstractImportant strands of the new institutionalism assume that the efficiency of institutions declines over time. Institutions, according to this view, are more stable than their environment, which supposedly results in an ever increasing misfit. This misfit, it is hypothesized, can only be corrected by the creative destruction of the institutions. The article takes issue with this view. Using case studies from the international telecommunications regime and the German health care system, it argues that institutional persistence does not necessarily prevent institutional adaptation. While it is an obstacle to creative destruction, it is compatible with other forms of institutional transformation, which have not received much attention from institutionalist scholars. Inert structures can be patched up with new structures or transposed to new functions. The article analyzes patching up and transposition as distinct modes of institutional change, and assesses their adaptive potential.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherWileyen
dc.relation.ispartofGovernanceen
dc.titleThe dynamics of inertia : institutional persistence and change in telecommunications and health careen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/0952-1895.281996028
dc.identifier.volume10en
dc.identifier.startpage43en
dc.identifier.endpage66en
dc.identifier.issue1en


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record