dc.contributor.author | INNERARITY, Daniel | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-12-10T13:48:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-12-10T13:48:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Catalan journal of communication & cultural studies, 2019, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 311-315 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1757-1898 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1757-1901 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1814/65446 | |
dc.description.abstract | It is still true that defining problems is half the way to finding a solution. In this article I aim to explain how I see the Catalan conflict and, in so doing, do my best not to turn my preferences into prejudices and try to strike a balance between the descriptions of reality that seem to ignore the tensions and the descriptions that excessively dramatize the differences. In a context where political agents are more interested in proving the strength of their character and their convictions than in getting results and signing agreements, I defend that there is a procedure for reaching a solution that should respect three principles: representation, revisability and indeterminacy. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Intellect | en |
dc.relation.ispartof | Catalan journal of communication & cultural studies | en |
dc.subject | Catalan conflict | en |
dc.subject | Dialogue | en |
dc.subject | Negotiated solution | en |
dc.subject | Independence | en |
dc.title | An algorithm for Catalonia | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 110.1386/cjcs_00010_1 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 11 | en |
dc.identifier.startpage | 311 | en |
dc.identifier.endpage | 315 | en |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | en |