Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorABRARDI, Laura
dc.contributor.authorCAMBINI, Carlo
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-10T16:07:22Z
dc.date.available2020-02-10T16:07:22Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationJournal of economic behavior & organization, 2019, Vol. 164, pp. 13-30en
dc.identifier.issn0167-2681
dc.identifier.issn1879-1751
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/65989
dc.descriptionAvailable online 4 June 2019en
dc.description.abstractWe analyze the determinants of the incentives that a paternalistic social planner should provide to improve the behavior of time-inconsistent consumers. We focus on the specific case in which consumers can reduce their future consumption by exerting self-control effort in non-observable and non-contractible activities. For example, they can reduce their future healthcare costs by practicing physical exercise. Differently from the results obtained by the sin taxes theory, we find that incentives that address the under-exertion of effort by present-biased consumers are always socially costly even when consumers are homogeneous. Moreover, we show that incentives are first increasing and then decreasing in the level of time-inconsistency, due to the ineffectiveness of incentive policies. Incentives are also affected by the degree of naivety in a non-monotonic way. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of economic behavior & organizationen
dc.subjectOptimal paternalismen
dc.subjectTime-inconsistencyen
dc.subjectSin taxesen
dc.subjectPresent-biasen
dc.titleIncentivizing self-control efforten
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jebo.2019.05.030
dc.identifier.volume164
dc.identifier.startpage13
dc.identifier.endpage30
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record