| dc.contributor.author | HUYSMANS, Martijn | |
| dc.contributor.author | SWINNEN, Johan | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-02-10T16:08:25Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-02-10T16:08:25Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Journal of agricultural economics, 2019, Vol. 70, No. 2, pp. 550-559 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0021-857X | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1477-9552 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1814/66056 | |
| dc.description | First published:04 April 2019 | en |
| dc.description.abstract | Geographical Indications (GIs) are increasingly important instruments of agricultural and food regulations and are growing as contentious issues in trade negotiations and disputes. GIs can improve welfare but they can also be a protectionist instrument. The EU has the most GIs in the world, but they are concentrated in the south of the EU. Even excluding wine, there are seven times more food GIs per capita in the southern EU Member States than in other EU Member States. This note discusses several factors which may explain the geographic concentration of GIs in the south of the EU. | en |
| dc.description.sponsorship | KU Leuven (Methusalem Program) | en |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Excellence of Science (EOS) Research project of FWO | en |
| dc.description.sponsorship | EUEuropean Union (EU) | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Wiley | en |
| dc.relation | 770680 | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of agricultural economics | en |
| dc.subject | Europe | en |
| dc.subject | geographical indications | en |
| dc.subject | political economy | en |
| dc.subject | regulation | en |
| dc.title | No terroir in the cold? : a note on the geography of geographical indications | en |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/1477-9552.12328 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 70 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 550 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 559 | |
| eui.subscribe.skip | true | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 2 | |