Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSCHITTEKATTE, Tim
dc.contributor.authorMEEUS, Leonardo
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-20T14:33:44Z
dc.date.available2020-02-20T14:33:44Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationUtilities policy, 2020, Vol. 63, Art. 101017, OnlineOnlyen
dc.identifier.issn0957-1787
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/66226
dc.descriptionAvailable online 5 February 2020
dc.description.abstractFlexibility markets are a promising tool to make better use of existing distribution grids. We analyse four pioneering projects implementing flexibility markets: Piclo Flex, Enera, GOPACS, and NODES. Based on a literature review, we develop a six-question framework. We find that all of the considered flexibility markets are operated by a third party. All projects also engage with multiple DSOs to become the standardized platform provider. Differences among the projects are found in the extent to which the flexibility markets are integrated into other existing markets, the use of reservation payments, the use of standardized products, and the way TSO-DSO cooperation is done. The answers to these questions vary for the projects because of different visions, use cases, or project maturity. Our case study analysis of four pioneering projects enriches the taxonomy and shows that practice is moving faster than the conceptual debate around flexibility markets.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.relation.ispartofUtilities policyen
dc.relation.ispartofseries[Florence School of Regulation]en
dc.relation.ispartofseries[Electricity]en
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/63066
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleFlexibility markets : Q&A with project pioneersen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jup.2020.101017
dc.identifier.volume63en
dc.description.versionPublished version of EUI RSCAS WP 2019/39 FSR


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record