Open Access
Thinking inside the box : the promise and boundaries of transparency in automated decision-making
Loading...
Files
AEL_2020_01.pdf (493.07 KB)
Full-text in Open Access
License
Attribution 4.0 International
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1831-4066
Issue Date
Type of Publication
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
EUI AEL; 2020/01
Cite
KOIVISTO, Ida, Thinking inside the box : the promise and boundaries of transparency in automated decision-making, EUI AEL, 2020/01 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/67272
Abstract
The normative attractivity of transparency is beyond compare. No wonder it is one of the main principles in the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation. It also features in a majority of AI ethics codes. Transparency is called for because it is assumed that it will solve the so-called ‘black box problem’ (uncertainty about how inputs translate into outputs in algorithmic systems) and by so doing legitimize automated decision-making (computer-based decisionmaking without human influence; ADM). In this paper, the legitimizing effect of transparency in ADM is discussed. I argue that transparency cannot deliver in its quest to resolve the black box problem. The main claim is that transparency is inherently performative in nature and cannot but be so. This performativity goes against the promise of unmediated visibility, vested in transparency. As demonstrated, when transparency is brought into the context of ADM, its hidden functioning logic becomes visible in a new way.