Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBONK, Alica Ida
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-26T11:02:42Z
dc.date.available2020-11-26T11:02:42Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationFlorence : European University Institute, 2020en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/69001
dc.descriptionDefence date: 23 November 2020en
dc.descriptionExamining Board: Prof. Evi Pappa (University Carlos III of Madrid); Prof. Leonardo Melosi (European University Institute and Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago); Prof. Sarantis Kalyvitis (Athens University of Economics and Business); Prof. Antonio Navas (University of Sheffield)en
dc.description.abstractChapter 1 introduces a new data set containing daily trade policy statements issued by government agencies between 2007 and 2019. Entries are classified along several dimensions: the direction of the policy change, the stage of the reform, and the initiating country. I argue that combining this narrative information with stock market data allows to identify unanticipated trade policy shocks. Stock returns generated around statement releases vary by firms' trade exposure and provide timely signals on the sign and size of trade policy changes. Furthermore, US exporters' stocks only respond to official statements but not to trade-related tweets by Donald Trump, demonstrating the ability to filter out particularly noisy signals. Chapter 2 builds on Chapter 1 and analyzes the short- and medium-term effects of trade policy on the US economy. Estimating impulse response functions by local projections, we uncover interesting asymmetries and non-linearities depending on the sign and size of trade policy shocks. Moreover, firm investment, unemployment and consumption react more strongly to shocks caused by trade partners rather than by the US. In addition, we show that implementations elicit more significant responses than announcements. Uncertain about whether policymakers will follow through with announced policy changes, firms and households take a "wait and see" approach. Chapter 3 turns to a different topic. Men typically bear the brunt of recessions due to stronger cyclicality of their employment and wages relative to women's. We study whether fiscal policy may offset or worsen these asymmetries across genders. Using US micro-level data, we find that men are hurt or benefit less than women from increases in major government spending components. This result is largely driven by negative spillovers for men working in the private sector. Our analysis highlights that fiscal expansions cannot reconcile both policy goals: offsetting inequitable business cycle effects and closing gender gaps.en
dc.description.tableofcontents-- 1. Combining narrative and stock market data to identify trade policy shocks : evidence from a new database -- 2. The macroeconomic impact of trade policy : a new identification approach -- 3. From he-cession to she-stimulus? The impact of fiscal policy on gender gapsen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherEuropean University Instituteen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUIen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesECOen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPhD Thesisen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subject.lcshInternational trade
dc.subject.lcshFiscal policy
dc.subject.lcshWelfare economics
dc.titleEssays on trade, fiscal policy and gender equalityen
dc.typeThesisen
dc.identifier.doi10.2870/995190
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record