Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBLANC, Théo
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-15T08:51:46Z
dc.date.available2020-12-15T08:51:46Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationConfluences Méditerranée, 2020, Vol. 3, No. 114, pp. 67-84en
dc.identifier.issn1148-2664
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/69255
dc.descriptionPublished online: 27 October 2020en
dc.description.abstractThe “specialisation” (takhasus) of Ennahdha, often interpreted as the exit of political Islam, in fact consists neither in an ideological nor organisational rupture. It constitutes first and foremost a skilled political communication around a choice resulting from of a long-standing party debate and implementing compliance with the law. It is thus more pertinent to (re)think the reconfiguration rather than the disappearance of Islamism. Moreover, it is not specialisation but rather Ghannouchi’s authoritarian decision-making pattern – especially on the issue of reintegration former regime figures – and the poor socioeconomic performance of Ennahdha that nurtured the rise of a twofold internal and external (Itilaf al-Karama) opposition.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis article has benefited from the support of the French Ministry of Higher Education and of the European University Institute of Florence.en
dc.language.isofren
dc.publisherL'Harmattanen
dc.relation.ispartofConfluences Méditerranéeen
dc.titleRetour critique et perspectives futures quatre ans après la 'spécialisation' d’Ennahdhaen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.3917/come.114.0067
dc.identifier.volume3en
dc.identifier.startpage67en
dc.identifier.endpage84en
dc.identifier.issue114en


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record