Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPETERSMANN, Ernst-Ulrich
dc.contributor.authorMARTINICO, Giuseppe
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-26T10:49:11Z
dc.date.available2021-01-26T10:49:11Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationChina and WTO review, 2020, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 269-290en
dc.identifier.issn2383-8221
dc.identifier.issn2384-4388
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/69697
dc.description.abstractThis article focuses on China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) as a potential cause of trade,investment, financial, maritime, energy trade and intellectual property disputes. In so doingthis contribution discusses the increasing “ systemic rivalry ” among authoritarian, neo-liberal and ordo-liberal conceptions of international economic law and the resulting legal problems in the settlement of BRI disputes inside the EU countries, whose courts may notrecognize arbitration awards by Chinese arbitration institutions and may hold Chineseinvestors accountable for disregard for human and labor rights in their BRI investmentinside the EU countries.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherYIJUN Institute of International Lawen
dc.relation.ispartofChina and WTO reviewen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subject.otherCoFoEen
dc.subject.otherEU in the worlden
dc.titleCan China’s belt and road initiative be reconciled with the EU’s multilateral approaches to international law?en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.14330/cwr.2020.6.2.02
dc.identifier.volume6en
dc.identifier.startpage269en
dc.identifier.endpage290en
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue2en


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record