Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBAMIEH, Omar
dc.contributor.authorFIORINI, Matteo
dc.contributor.authorHOEKMAN, Bernard M.
dc.contributor.authorJAKUBIK, Adam
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-22T15:48:45Z
dc.date.available2021-02-22T15:48:45Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationReview of industrial organization, 2020, Vol. 57, No. 2, pp. 333-349en
dc.identifier.issn0889-938X
dc.identifier.issn1573-7160
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/70093
dc.descriptionFirst published online: June 2020en
dc.description.abstractWe present industry-level evidence that manufacturing sectors that make use of services as inputs more intensively are more robust to shocks from import competition. Specifically, the negative effect of the China shock on US manufacturing employment is lower for industries with high services input intensity. Furthermore, our analysis reveals significant heterogeneity in the impact of different types of services, which points towards a fruitful research agenda on the role of services as a determinant of firm competitiveness.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringeren
dc.relation.ispartofReview of industrial organizationen
dc.titleServices input intensity and us manufacturing employment responses to the China shocken
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11151-020-09770-2
dc.identifier.volume57
dc.identifier.startpage333
dc.identifier.endpage349
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue2


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record