Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTHOMAS, Anja
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-22T15:49:49Z
dc.date.available2021-02-22T15:49:49Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationPolitique européenne, 2020, Vol. 67-68, No. 1-2, pp. 158-186en
dc.identifier.issn1623-6297
dc.identifier.issn2105-2875
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/70178
dc.descriptionFirst published online: January 2020en
dc.description.abstractThe article reveals how the patterning of European affairs in the Assemblee Nationale and the Bundestag goes hand in hand with a divergence in the logic motivating the reforms of each chamber's formal frameworks for EU participation. While early reforms were the fruit of a great variety of ideological or power battles in both parliaments, reforms after the significant increase in EU decision making in the 1990s correspond to different domestic roles played by MPs. This observation can be understood through the emergence of 'typical' change agents sharing `typical' motives about necessary reforms across party lines in both chambers.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherEditions L'Harmattanen
dc.relation.ispartofPolitique européenneen
dc.titleDomesticating' and differentiating the European Union : parliamentary EU experts in the Assemblée Nationale and the Bundestagen
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.volume67-68
dc.identifier.startpage158
dc.identifier.endpage186
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue1-2


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record