Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTAYLOR ARMSTRONG, Sylvie Grace
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-27T07:38:18Z
dc.date.available2021-04-27T07:38:18Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationJournal of gender studies, 2021,Vol. 30, No. 7, pp. 864-867en
dc.identifier.issn0958-9236
dc.identifier.issn1465-3869
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/70935
dc.descriptionFirst published: 13 April 2021en
dc.description.abstractThough commercial surrogates are paid for providing a service, there is systemic reluctance to characterize these arrangements as ‘work’. No jurisdiction in the world currently uses a labour law model to regulate this practice. Perhaps more significantly, research has found that industry narratives in popular commercial destinations including Georgia, California, and (formerly) India are constructed around expectations of altruism, which distance surrogates from their identity as workers even when paid. This contribution explores one aspect of this: the practical concern that normalizing contract pregnancy will cause it to become a mainstream solution to unemployment. It is argued that this assumption is a further manifestation of the ‘devaluation thesis’ already experienced by reproductive labourers. Once unpicked, it becomes apparent that surrogacy is not a role that can be successfully performed by anyone with a uterus. With proper screening, this concern could be managed.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherRoutledgeen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of gender studiesen
dc.titleSurrogacy : time we recognized it as a job?en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09589236.2021.1915754
dc.identifier.volume30
dc.identifier.startpage864
dc.identifier.endpage867
dc.identifier.issue7


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record