Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVERALDI, Jacquelyn
dc.contributor.authorLAULHE SHAELOU, Stephanie
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-29T08:07:39Z
dc.date.available2021-07-29T08:07:39Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/72058
dc.description.abstractIn 2018, it was clarified that, “every Member State must ensure that the bodies which, as ‘courts or tribunals’ within the meaning of EU law, come within its judicial system in the fields covered by that law, meet the requirements of effective judicial protection.” This statement by the Court of Justice (ECJ) in Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses (ASJP) represented an important clarification in respect to the possibility of protecting the independence of the EU judiciary under EU law, which falls under the principle of effective judicial protection. This was perhaps the most consequential development in the Court’s judicial independence-related case law to date, in which the Court, “establishe[d] a general obligation for Member States to guarantee and respect the independence of their national courts and tribunals” via their interpretation of Article 19(1) of the Treaty on European Union second subparagraph.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Central Lancashireen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEuropean Union Law and Governance in Populist Timesen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEU-POPen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJMMWPen
dc.relation.ispartofseries01/2021en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.titleThe substantive requirements of judicial independence in the EU : lessons from times of crisisen
dc.typeWorking Paperen


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record