Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSCHIMMELFENNIG, Frank
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-12T08:17:02Z
dc.date.available2022-05-12T08:17:02Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.isbn9789294662064
dc.identifier.issn2467-4540
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/74519
dc.description.abstractDoes differentiated integration improve member state compliance? Is it more effective in overcoming non-compliance than flexible implementation? The results of the study do not provide sufficient grounds for recommending the use of differentiated integration as an instrument to improve compliance with EU directives. Nor do they convincingly show that either differentiated integration or flexible implementation are preferable in a compliance perspective. The findings indicate that both differentiated integration and flexible implementation serve primarily to facilitate intergovernmental and interinstitutional agreement in decision-making on EU legislation – but do not make a systematic difference for compliance.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherEuropean University Instituteen
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/822304/EUen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPolicy Briefsen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2022/30en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIntegrating Diversity in the European Union (InDivEU) en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectDifferentiated integrationen
dc.subjectEuropean Unionen
dc.subjectComplianceen
dc.subjectFlexible implementationen
dc.titleDifferentiated integration does not improve member state complianceen
dc.typeOtheren
dc.identifier.doi10.2870/42353
dc.rights.licenseAttribution 4.0 International*


Files associated with this item

Icon
Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International