Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTORTI, Valerio
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-11T12:40:41Z
dc.date.available2022-10-11T12:40:41Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationEuropean intellectual property review, 2022, Vol. 44, No. 10, pp. 575-585en
dc.identifier.issn0142-0461
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/74942
dc.descriptionPublished online: 07 October 2022
dc.description.abstractA new front has recently emerged in SEP global battles, concerning the legitimacy of judicially determining FRAND worldwide royalties despite the absence of consent of all parties involved. The Unwired Planet decision in the UK, as well as other disputes in the EU and Asia, have given rise to such a new judicial trend in the context of standard essential patents litigation. But should national courts be allowed to embark on a similar comprehensive analysis of the litigants’ global business relationship? After recalling the most recent initiatives adopted at EU, UK and US levels in order to bring more transparency in SEP licensing negotiations, the article will explore the risks and disadvantages of this judicial practice, as also emerged from recent FRAND litigation.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSweet and Maxwellen
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean intellectual property reviewen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.titleWorldwide FRAND licences in global patent litigationen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.volume44en
dc.identifier.startpage575en
dc.identifier.endpage585en
dc.identifier.issue10en


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record