Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTAYLOR ARMSTRONG, Sylvie Grace
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-12T15:19:03Z
dc.date.available2023-01-12T15:19:03Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationHastings women's law journal, 2022, Vol. 33, No. 1, OnlineOnlyen
dc.identifier.issn1061-0901
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/75190
dc.descriptionPublished online: 14 January 2022en
dc.description.abstractAssisted Reproductive Technology continues to grow in popularity. Commercial surrogacy has proved no exception to this trend. However, lack of regulation at the international, federal, and state levels has given rise to a myriad of ethical and legal problems. This article considers the taxonomical question that any regulator must ask: Which field of law ought to be responsible for regulating this industry? It argues that although commercial surrogacy is often discussed as part of the family law rubric, on closer inspection, family law is fundamentally ill-suited to meet the needs of those involved in commercial surrogacy. By demonstrating the challenges with this regulatory paradigm, this article lays the groundwork so that scholars of other areas of law might explore this issue.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of California Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofHastings women's law journalen
dc.relation.urihttps://repository.uchastings.edu/hwlj/vol33/iss1/3en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleCommercial surrogacy : building families outside of family lawen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.volume33
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue1


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record