Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorUNKS, Ryan
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-20T10:56:02Z
dc.date.available2023-07-20T10:56:02Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationLandscape ecology, 2023, OnlineFirsten
dc.identifier.issn0921-2973
dc.identifier.issn1572-9761
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/75789
dc.descriptionPublished online: 14 July 2023en
dc.description.abstractContext Interdisciplinary borrowing between ecology and the social sciences has produced numerous insights about pastoral livelihood practices and rangeland ecology, demonstrating how people practicing pastoralism constantly modify their practices to adapt to social, political, economic, and biophysical change. Objectives I outline an approach for integrating research on pastoral livelihoods into a landscape ecology framework. I focus on access to land and resources, and an integrative approach to scale, to assess the relationship between landscape and social processes. Methods I use remotely sensed data and ethnographic analysis of livelihood change in two semi-arid contexts in Kenya to compare broad scale changes in pastoral mobility to spatio-temporal patterns of variability in rainfall and vegetation productivity. I then synthesize the political, economic, and social relations that have most prominently infuenced access to land and restructured landscape process at fner scales. Results Spatial controls have been imposed on land use that have increasingly partitioned landscapes and concentrated pastoral access to land. Access to land has also been infuenced by changes in social norms, employment, and market relations. Informal rules and norms, social diferentiation, and exclusionary partitions have produced socially diferentiated land use intensity gradients and novel landscape processes that have not previously been considered in landscape analyses in Kenya. Conclusions Understanding access, land use, and landscape processes as intertwined, with uneven processes of land and resource capture at diferent scales, would enable landscape ecologists to choose observational scales relevant to rural livelihoods and sensitive to power asymmetries, creating robust analytical linkages between social and ecological processes.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSpringeren
dc.relation.ispartofLandscape ecologyen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleReframing rangeland systems science research in Kenya : a synthesis of social-science mixed methods to inform integrative analysis of landscape pattern and processen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10980-023-01723-w
dc.rights.licenseAttribution 4.0 International*


Files associated with this item

Icon
Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International