Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBREKKE, Stein Arne
dc.contributor.authorNAURIN, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorSADL, Urska
dc.contributor.authorLÓPEZ ZURITA, Lucía
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-09T11:42:09Z
dc.date.available2024-01-09T11:42:09Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationJournal of common market studies, 2022, Vol. 61, No. 1, pp. 58-75en
dc.identifier.issn0021-9886
dc.identifier.issn1468-5965
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/76268
dc.descriptionPublished online: 09 June 2022en
dc.description.abstractEffective procedural arrangements allow courts to reconcile conflicting demands of timely justice and sound legal argument. In the context of the European Union, conflict between these demands emerged most acutely in the face of paralyzing delays in the preliminary reference procedure. It was partly solved by Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure. The provision allowed the European Court of Justice to dispose of repetitive and legally undemanding cases with a reasoned order in lieu of a judgment. This article analyses all published orders of the European Court of Justice to examine the use and the implications of Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure. It is the first article to do so. We find that the Court resorts to orders to save time and to halt repeated questions from the courts of a single Member State.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis article was published Open Access with the support from the European University Institute Research Council.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherWileyen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of common market studiesen
dc.relation.isbasedonhttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/69459
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleThat's an order! : how the quest for efficiency is transforming judicial cooperation in Europeen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jcms.13346
dc.identifier.volume61en
dc.identifier.startpage58en
dc.identifier.endpage75en
dc.identifier.issue1en
dc.rights.licenseAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.description.versionThe article is a published version of iCourts Working Paper 2020/219en


Files associated with this item

Icon
Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International