Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorINNERARITY, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-11T15:51:35Z
dc.date.available2024-01-11T15:51:35Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationLa maleta de Portbou, 2023, No. 60, pp. 63-70en
dc.identifier.issn2339-6768
dc.identifier.issn2339-6776
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/76296
dc.description.abstractArtificial intelligence programs celebrate spectacular successes not only in the realm of calculus, analytical prediction or diagnostics, but also in musical composition, the creative modelling of visual processes, TV series, architectural design or the writing of stories. These advances in artificial intelligence have led many people to speculate that human beings will soon be replaced in many realms, even in the realm of creativity. AI-Generated Art could assume responsibility for our artistic creativity; we could automatize or mechanize creativity, as is also predicted about work or democracy. If artistic creativity was one of the final domains of the distinction between humans and computers, this last bastion seems to also now have been destroyed, and we could be entering a time of art without human authors.en
dc.language.isoesen
dc.publisherGalaxia Gutenbergen
dc.relation.ispartofLa maleta de Portbouen
dc.titleUn parlamento para los algoritmosen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.startpage63en
dc.identifier.endpage70en
dc.identifier.issue60en


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record