Date: 2024
Type: Article
What went wrong in Hungary
Journal of democracy, 2024, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 52-64
ANGHEL, Veronica, JONES, Erik, What went wrong in Hungary, Journal of democracy, 2024, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 52-64
- https://hdl.handle.net/1814/76791
Retrieved from Cadmus, EUI Research Repository
Why did Hungarian democracy have a harder time developing and rooting itself than democracy in other countries? The answer lies in the overlapping institutions and incentives that create democratic resilience. Hungary's political elites never finished their constitutional transition from communism to democracy by agreeing on a new democratic constitution. The 1998 elections polarized Hungarian politics around competing conceptions of democracy in ways that made it hard to reach consensus on a shared constitutional arrangement. Viktor Orbán and his Fidesz party rose to power in the late 1990s by offering a strong state that would protect Hungarian society from the threat of social liberalism and foreclose a potential return of communism. Orbán returned to power in 2010, on the heels of the global financial crisis, and began centralizing and entrenching power by deft manipulation of democratic institutions. The case of Hungary tells us what to look for in anticipating democratic failure and serves as a cautionary tale for the EU.
Additional information:
Published online: April 2024
Cadmus permanent link: https://hdl.handle.net/1814/76791
Full-text via DOI: 10.1353/jod.2024.a922833
ISSN: 1045-5736; 1086-3214
Publisher: Johns Hopkins University Press
Files associated with this item
- Name:
- What_went_wrong_in_Hungary_Art ...
- Size:
- 387.2Kb
- Format:
- Description:
- Full text in Open Access, Final ...