Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYORDANOVA, Nikoleta
dc.date.accessioned2009-11-10T11:18:50Z
dc.date.available2009-11-10T11:18:50Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Union Politics, 2009, 10, 2, 253-280.en
dc.identifier.issn1465-1165 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1741-2757 (online)
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/12797
dc.description.abstractAlthough most of the legislative tasks of the European Parliament(EP) are performed in its committees, it is controversial how representative they are of the overall plenary. Distributive, informational and partisan theories suggest respectively that the committee assignments system is designed to (1) serve special interests outside the EP, (2) bring informational benefits to the plenary or (3) promote partisan interests. These propositions are examined via a representative sample of committees using an original data set of MEPs' profiles in the 6th European Parliament. The results show that, whereas information-driven committees attract mainly MEPs with relevant expertise, homogeneous special interests influence assignments to interest-driven and mixed committees, turning them into preference outlying committees. However, partisan considerations do not appear to influence individual assignments strategically.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleThe Rationale behind Committee Assignment in the European Parliament: Distributive, Informational and Partisan Perspectivesen
dc.typeArticleen


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record