Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorROTOLO, Antonino
dc.contributor.authorSARTOR, Giovanni
dc.contributor.authorSMITH, Clara
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T10:27:01Z
dc.date.available2014-03-14T10:27:01Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Business Process Integration and Management, 2009, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 154-173en
dc.identifier.issn1741-8771
dc.identifier.issn1741-8763
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/30338
dc.description.abstractThis paper provides a formal analysis of good faith in terms of a notion of satisfaction of given correctness rules. We consider the distinction between objective and subjective good faith, focusing on observable behaviour, the former, and on beliefs, the latter. The form given to the correctness rules will allow us to impose both positive and negative requirements to be fulfilled. This analysis is then incorporated into an extension of defeasible logic, in order to provide a computational framework to deal with the various versions of good faith previously discussed. Finally, we outline some formal connections between good faith and trust.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Business Process Integration and Managementen
dc.titleGood faith in contract negotiation and performanceen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1504/IJBPIM.2009.030983
dc.identifier.volume4en
dc.identifier.startpage154en
dc.identifier.endpage173en
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue3en


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record