Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVAN 'T KLOOSTER, Jens
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-22T15:49:16Z
dc.date.available2021-02-22T15:49:16Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationJournal of politics, 2020, Vol. 82, No. 2, pp. 587-599en
dc.identifier.issn0022-3816
dc.identifier.issn1468-2508
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/70130
dc.descriptionFirst published online: 01 April 2020en
dc.description.abstractThe global financial crisis of 2007 and 2008 transformed monetary policy, forcing central bankers to move far beyond their pre-crisis instruments, goals, and expertise. In this article, I investigate these developments from a perspective of normative democratic theory. Against authors who reject central bank independence entirely, I argue that it should in principle be permissible for governments to delegate political choices to unelected experts. From a democratic perspective, what matters is whether the act of delegation serves the government's ultimate economic policy aims. Although central bank independence limits the government's control over monetary policy, it can also improve monetary policy and thereby help the government pursue its larger economic policies. I outline a moral framework for balancing these competing considerations; focusing on the case of the European Central Bank, I then argue for democratic reform of existing institutions.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Chicago Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of politicsen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.titleThe ethics of delegating monetary policyen
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1086/706765
dc.identifier.volume82
dc.identifier.startpage587
dc.identifier.endpage599
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue2


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record