Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLOTT, Gaia
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-26T12:46:45Z
dc.date.available2022-09-26T12:46:45Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationContemporary European history, 2023, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 459-474en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/74894
dc.descriptionPublished online by Cambridge University Press: 25 April 2022en
dc.description.abstractThe Dublin Convention (1990) was the first binding agreement on asylum between the member states of the European Community. It defined the criteria that determined responsibility for the examination of asylum applications lodged in their territories. Given the contemporary discussions about the system that derived from it, the paper reflects on one of its main criteria: the first entry principle. Drawing on archival research in Belgium, France and the United Kingdom, the essay shows how the inclusion of the first entry principle was far more than a matter of course. It was influenced by the Schengen process and the establishment of the single market, previous North-South tensions over migratory issues, and governments’ (in)capacity to predict future developments. The inclusion of the first entry principle contributed to assimilating asylum policy with migration control, creating the premises for the subsequent burden-sharing problems and readmission agreement practices.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofContemporary European historyen
dc.titleThe Dublin Convention and the introduction of the ‘first entry rule’ in the allocation of asylum seekers in Europeen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0960777321000746
dc.identifier.volume32
dc.identifier.startpage459
dc.identifier.endpage474
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue3


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record