Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKJAER, Poul
dc.date.accessioned2008-07-18T13:12:34Z
dc.date.available2008-07-18T13:12:34Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citationFlorence : European University Institute, 2008en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/9067
dc.descriptionDefence date: 20 June 2008en
dc.descriptionJury Members: Prof. Niels Åkerstrøm Andersen, Copenhagen Business School; Prof. Damian Chalmers, London School of Economics and Political Science; Prof. Marise Cremona, European University Institute; Prof. Dr. Christian Joerges, European University Institute/University of Bremen (Supervisor).en
dc.descriptionFulltext in Open Access was removed in January 2010 upon request by the author due to publication of the thesis with a commercial publisher.
dc.descriptionFirst made available online: 29 July 2021
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation explains the emergence and functioning of three forms of governance structures within the context of the European integration and constitutionalisation process: comitology, (regulatory) agencies and the Open Method of Co-ordination. The point of departure is the insight that the intergovernmental/supranational distinction, which most theories of European integration and constitutionalisation rely on, has lost its strength. A new paradigm of EU research is therefore needed. Against this background it is suggested that the distinction between governing and governance provides a more appropriate basis for analysing the phenomenon of integration and constitutionalisation in Europe. The distinction between governing and governance allows for an understanding of the EU as a hybrid consisting of a governing dimension, characterised by legal and organisational hierarchy, and a governance dimension which operates within a network form characterised by legal and organisational heterarchy. The function of governance structures is to ensure the embeddedness of the governing dimension in the wider society. Instead of representing contradictory developments, the two dimensions are therefore mutually constitutive in the sense that more governing implies more governance and vice versa. These theoretical insights are illustrated through two detailed case studies which respectively reconstruct the operational mode of the Open Method of Coordination within EU Research & Development Policy and the regulatory system for the EU chemicals market (REACH). The book is inter-disciplinary in nature and incorporates insights from law, political science and sociology.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherEuropean University Instituteen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUIen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLAWen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPhD Thesisen
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/13347
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.lcshConstitutional law -- European Union countriesen
dc.subject.lcshDecision making -- European Union countriesen
dc.subject.lcshAdministrative agencies -- European Union countriesen
dc.subject.lcshEuropean Union countries -- Politics and governmenten
dc.titleBetween Governing and Governance: On the Emergence, Function and Form of Europe’s Post-national Constellationen
dc.typeThesisen
dc.identifier.doi10.2870/18263
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record