Person

WINDFELD, Frederik Carl

EUI affiliated iconORCID icon
Profile Picture
Email Address
Birth Date
Research Projects
relationships.isOrgUnitOf
Job Title
Last Name
WINDFELD
First Name
Frederik Carl
Name

Filters

2024 - 20253
Reset filters

Settings

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Embargoed Access
    Apprenticeship in diplomacy, or how I became another replaceable intern at the OECD
    (2024, Article) 
    International political sociology, 2024, Vol. 18, No. 3, OnlineFirst
    What can we learn about diplomacy by studying its practice through the body of an apprentice? Drawing on the works of Loïc Wacquant, this article argues that to understand the making of background dispositions, tacit rules, and situated know-how in international politics’ diverse fields of practice, researchers ought to consider apprenticeship as a concept and a methodological device. This argument is based on ethnographic observations from the author’s internship at the Delegation of Denmark to the OECD. As a concept, apprenticeship cultivates a sensitivity to the embodied dynamics at play in acquiring habitus. An apprenticeship is structured as a participatory and corporeal process of socialization through which an aspirant acquires or fails to acquire a prospective identity within a given field of practice. Methodologically, studying practices of initiation through the body of an apprentice enables scholars to access tacit knowledge transmissions while recognizing that such knowledge operates beneath discursive representation and logical reasoning. In advancing this argument, the article foregrounds the figure of the apprentice and the experience of apprenticeship as conduits for gaining insights into social learning in diplomacy, other fields of practice, and the broader domain of socialization in International Relations.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Open Access
    Gothic visibilities and international relations : uncanny icons, critical comics, and the politics of abjection in Aleppo
    (2024, Article)  ; ; 
    Review of international studies, 2024, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 3-34
    The war in Syria has been communicated to global audiences through images of dead and injured children, decapitated and tortured bodies, and ruined cities. The article shows how news media coverage of the war’s impact on the city of Aleppo invoked a Gothic tradition. Drawing on Kristeva and Freud’s concepts of the abject and the uncanny, the article argues that the Gothic tradition can further International Relations research on the constitution of Selves and Others. The Gothic Other is constituted through the (Gothic) Self’s repulsion, fascination, and desire, and the Gothic tradition revolves around an understanding of the invisible as an in-between space of fear and anticipation. The ability to recognise Gothic themes in an image depends on one’s familiarity with the Gothic tradition, hence images are theorised as having a Gothic potentiality. The article focuses on how the Anglo-Saxon Gothic tradition enabled Western readers to identify Gothic themes in news coverage of the war in Aleppo. The article adopts a multimethod strategy including a content analysis of 457 images published by Western news media; a discourse analysis of news stories; an analysis of three Gothic, uncanny iconic motifs; and an author-created comic drawing on Gothic elements from the published photographs.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Embargoed Access
    Struggles over epistemic capital : complex governance objects and the making of lethal autonomous weapons systems
    (2025, Article) 
    Contemporary security policy, 2025, OnlineFirst
    The regulation of lethal autonomous weapons systems (LAWS) has emerged as a salient and perplexing issue in global governance, especially in the UN GGE on LAWS. This article argues that contentions over defining and regulating LAWS extend beyond country positions. As LAWS are mobilised as a complex governance object, these disputes also stem from struggles over epistemic capital, where experts provide different interpretations of such systems’ component parts and functional properties. The article analyzes three epistemic domains—legal, technical, and military—in the academic debate over LAWS as proxies for the underlying codified capital that can be mobilized as a resource for epistemic power in the regulatory exercise. Each of the three domains offers a distinct rendering of LAWS, differing in emphasis, characterization, and assessment of regulatory prospects. The article highlights how the delineation of governance objects considered complex is a process which interpellates and reinforces epistemic authorities, thus generating political effects.