Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTÓKA, Gábor
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-06T13:37:27Z
dc.date.available2009-07-06T13:37:27Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationHans-Dieter KLINGEMANN (ed), The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009, 269-288en
dc.identifier.isbn9780199217359
dc.identifier.isbn0199217351
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/11922
dc.description.abstractThis article examines if intrinsic rewards of expected political benefits have a greater motivational force for turnout, political learning and the development of political preferences. Using comparative survey data from several dozen contemporary democracies, the article demonstrates that the intrinsic rewards (or consumption value) of party choice dominates the expected political benefits in the determination of political preferences and turnout, while political learning – exactly because it is an even more costly acivity for the individual citizen – has a fundamentally instrumental motivation. The theoretical discussion explains that the roots of this phenomenon lay in the most general characteristics of electoral democracy, and the empirical evidene shows that the relevant findings do indeed fail to vary by types of democratic institutional settings.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleExpressive vs. Instrumental Motivation of Turnout, Partisanship and Political Learningen
dc.typeContribution to booken


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record