Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTATHAM, Michael Robert
dc.date.accessioned2010-01-14T09:10:02Z
dc.date.available2010-01-14T09:10:02Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationJournal of European Public Policy, 2010, 17, 1, 76-99en
dc.identifier.issn1350-1763
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/13076
dc.description.abstractBoth the number and the powers of sub-state entities in the European Union (EU) have grown. These sub-state entities represent their European interests using both intra- and extra-state channels. The increasing use of the latter has encouraged scholarly literature to focus on the emerging 'paradiplomacy' of these entities. Sub-state paradiplomacy, however, can be both conducted in tandem with its member state or bypassing it. This article seeks to better understand such patterns of interaction between state and sub-state interest representation. Using original survey data, it tests five different hypotheses about the determinants of state bypassing and non-bypassing. It argues that devolution of powers and party politics are relevant factors explaining the frequency of bypassing and co-operative interest representation. Other factors, including size, financial resources and length of exposure to the integration process do not seem to play a role.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.title'With or Without You'? Revisiting territorial state-bypassing in EU interest representationen
dc.typeArticleen


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record