Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMIRCEA, Valentin
dc.contributor.authorPOPESCU, Magdalena
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-15T10:45:48Z
dc.date.available2019-02-15T10:45:48Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationRevista Romana de drept al afacerilor, 2018, Vol. 2, pp. 145-162en
dc.identifier.isbn15834931802
dc.identifier.issn1583-493X
dc.identifier.issn2286-0584
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/61104
dc.descriptionFirst published December 2018
dc.description.abstractThis paper highlights a frequent error in the analysis, by the public authorities and by the courts, of the infringements of the competition rules provided by Romanian Competition Law 21/1996 and by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. The error comes from the fact that, when assessing potential anticompetitive behaviours, especially since the ECHR decision in Menarini Diagnostics case (2011), the presumption of innocence and the rights and obligations which are attached to it, is fully applicable. The presumption of innocence prevails on the legal presumption which operates in the by object infringements and on the presumption of legality of an administrative act, to the extent that the later would confine the review made by a court only to the formal aspects of the sanctioning decision.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Romana de drept al afaceriloren
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.titlePrezumţia de nevinovăţie în dreptul concurenţeien
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.volume2en


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record