Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPEDRESCHI, Luigi Francesco
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-14T11:34:43Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationFlorence : European University Institute, 2019en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/64985
dc.descriptionDefence date: 16 September 2019en
dc.descriptionExamining Board: Emeritus Professor Marise Cremona, European University Institute (Supervisor); Professor Joanne Scott, European University Institute; Professor Piet Eeckhout, University College London; Professor Markus Krajewski, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen Nürnbergen
dc.description.abstractThis thesis examines the impact of European Union trade and investment agreements on public services of its member states. Typically, the relationship between EU law and public services is thought of as an internal question that concerns the single market and its impingement of such services. However, this neglects the potential effect of the Union’s external agreements. Their possible role has received widespread public attention but comparably little from academic circles, although a growing body of legal scholarship continues to develop. Against this backdrop, the overarching question of the thesis is whether public services are protected and treated as they should be in EU trade and investment agreements. This raises a number of sub-questions: how can international trade and investment rules impact public services; what obligation does the EU have to public services; does this extend to its international agreements; and, if so, do its external agreements meet its public service obligation. Over the course of six main chapters, each of these is addressed. Adopting doctrinal legal methodology, a broad argument is constructed that argues public services are a shared value of the Union that should shape its trade and investment policy. It is claimed the EU’s external treatment of public services should cohere with its internal treatment of public services. As it expands its collection of trade and investment agreements, the EU has made use of the existing toolkit of international trade and investment law. It has, however, done so in a tailored fashion thats carves out policy space for public services. Combined with its preclusion of direct effect, it is argued the EU’s agreements take important steps in satisfaction of their obligation to public services. That said, the approach adopted by the EU leaves significant room for future improvement.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherEuropean University Instituteen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUIen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLAWen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPhD Thesisen
dc.relation.replaceshttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/64986
dc.relation.replaceshttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/59667
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subject.lcshPublic utilities -- Law and legislation -- European Union countries
dc.subject.lcshForeign trade regulation -- European Union countries
dc.titlePublic services in EU trade and investment agreementsen
dc.typeThesisen
dc.identifier.doi10.2870/5472
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.embargo.terms2023-09-16
dc.date.embargo2023-09-16
dc.description.versionChapter 3 'The EU’s trade and investment policy' of the PhD thesis draws upon an earlier version published as chapter co-written with Dr Vivian Kube: "The social dimension of the common commercial policy" (2018), in the book 'The EU social market economy and the law : theoretical perspectives and practical challenges for the EU'
dc.description.versionChapter 6 'Excepting public services' of the PhD thesis draws upon an earlier version published as an article 'Balancing Efficacy with Policy Space: the Treatment of Public Services in EU Trade Agreements' (2017) in the journal 'Journal of international economic law'


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record