Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLAFFAN, Brigid
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-30T12:52:27Z
dc.date.available2021-03-30T12:52:27Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationJulie SMITH (ed.), The Palgrave handbook of European referendums, London : Springer, 2021, pp. 563-581en
dc.identifier.isbn9783030558024
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/70678
dc.description.abstractChanges to the Irish Constitution require a referendum and all major new EU treaties have been put to a popular vote in Ireland. Eight times since the mid-1980s, the Irish electorate has engaged in an intense, albeit not always informed debate, on a European treaty. Twice Irish voters rejected an EU treaty and twice Irish governments, supported by the main opposition parties, went back to the electorate to ask ‘Is this your final answer?’. It is important to analyse the Irish case of revisiting the results of referendums to understand the dynamics involved. A number of clear conclusions may be drawn. First, the Irish government backed by the Oireachtas managed the process. Second, returning to the electorate will only work if there is a broad domestic consensus that it is legitimate to revisit the outcome. Third, the EU collectively and the other member states make concessions, short of reopening the treaty, to support a second referendum.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSpringeren
dc.titleReferendums on EU treaty reform : revisiting the result in second referendumsen
dc.typeContribution to booken
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-030-55803-1


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record