Date: 2021
Type: Technical Report
Health resilience requires rigorous human rights assessment
Technical Report, STG Resilience Papers, 2021, [LAW]
SCHEININ, Martin, Health resilience requires rigorous human rights assessment, STG Resilience Papers, 2021, [LAW] - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/71701
Retrieved from Cadmus, EUI Research Repository
• Compliance with human rights is an important element of health resilience,
generating popular legitimacy and trust, legality and legal certainty, and
favourable effects for the economy. Crucially, it will save lives when societies will
be confronted with new pandemics.
• Comprehensive, structured and evidence-based assessment of national
responses to pandemics for their conformity with human rights is possible. It
requires a rigorous methodology. We have developed a model for COVID-19 (see,
Chart 1) that can be verified and then adapted to future pandemics by defining
those elements of the model that are constant and those that will need to be
modified for a new epidemic.
• A piloting exercise in respect of 17 countries and their performance during the
second half of 2020 allows for a set of comparative observations (see, Table 1 for
all grades and Table 2 for top-three and bottom-two countries). Most
importantly, the pilot study supports the conclusion that strong human rights
performance in respect of any category of human rights entails and requires
general compliance across all categories of human rights. This conclusion reflects
the principle of interdependence and indivisibility of all human rights.
• A global study of the human rights compatibility of national strategies against
COVID-19 in the course of 2021 should be commissioned, building on the expert
assessment methodology applied in the pilot study. A clear objective should be
included to produce a generalizable model that can be adapted to future
pandemics, through a modular structure that allows for adaptation to the
biological and epidemiological specificities of each pathogen and pandemic.
• Such a model could become a self-assessment tool in addressing national
strategies. Importantly, it would generate interaction between different
epistemic communities such as epidemiologists, economists, sociologists and
psychologists, lawyers and other experts on regulation, and human rights experts.
Collaboration between national experts or functionaries in various fields would
mainstream well-informed human rights considerations into national strategic
decision-making on health emergencies. This would significantly improve health
resilience.
Additional information:
This STG Resilience Paper is part of the Commission Research Report and Interim Progress Report (June 2021) published by Reform for Resilience.
Cadmus permanent link: https://hdl.handle.net/1814/71701
External link: https://www.r4rx.org/research-submissions
Series/Number: STG Resilience Papers; 2021; [LAW]
Publisher: European University Institute; Recovery Reform Resilience
Files associated with this item
- Name:
- Scheinin_2021.pdf
- Size:
- 412.8Kb
- Format:
- Description:
- Full-text in Open Access, Published ...