Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJONES, Erik
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-11T11:19:25Z
dc.date.available2022-02-11T11:19:25Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationCurrent history, 2021, Vol. 120, No. 824, pp. 93–99en
dc.identifier.issn0011-3530
dc.identifier.issn1944-785X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/74049
dc.descriptionPublished online: 01March 2021en
dc.description.abstractIn contrast with their halting response to the global financial crisis a decade ago, European policymakers acted quickly to mitigate the economic damage from the COVID-19 pandemic. They eased the way for governments to run deficits and increase their debt loads. In a breakthrough, the European Union agreed to a plan for common borrowing for a pandemic recovery fund. Although controversial in some countries, common debt would make it easier to address inequities among member states. But the plan was nearly derailed by objections from Poland and Hungary to a provision that would withhold funds from member states that violate the rule of law and other democratic norms, raising doubts about how transformative the borrowing precedent would prove to be.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of California Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofCurrent historyen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.titleDid the EU’s crisis response meet the moment?en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1525/curh.2021.120.824.93
dc.identifier.volume120en
dc.identifier.startpage93en
dc.identifier.endpage99en
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue824en


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record