| dc.contributor.author | CONVERSI, Daniele | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-01-08T17:01:21Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Cathie CARMICHAEL, Matthew D'AURIA and Aviel ROSHWALD (eds), The Cambridge history of nationhood and nationalism, Vol. 2 : nationalism's fields of interaction, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2023, pp. 485-502 | en |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 9781108551458 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1814/76261 | |
| dc.description | Published online: 08 November 2023 | en |
| dc.description.abstract | Ideas of citizenship have changed considerably since the concept was first envisioned in classical antiquity (Greece and Rome). For a long time, it remained an uncertain and undefined area – so that, for instance, Aristotle saw no general agreement on a definition of citizenship. The citizenship laws of Athens distinguished between citizens, slaves, and non-slave residents (metics), including prosperous and affluent merchants. Eventually, the Citizenship Law introduced by Pericles (451 BCE) extended the status of citizen to offspring whose parents were both Athenians. | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.publisher | Cambridge University Press | en |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess | en |
| dc.title | Citizenship and nationhood : from Antiquity to Gaia citizenship | en |
| dc.type | Contribution to book | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1017/9781108551458.024 | |
| dc.embargo.terms | 2024-05-08 | |
| dc.date.embargo | 2024-05-08 | |