dc.contributor.author | MICKLITZ, Hans-Wolfgang | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-03T13:41:16Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-03T13:41:16Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1725-6739 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1814/23275 | |
dc.description | The WP revised version, language corrections, available online on 9 October 2012. | |
dc.description.abstract | The paper is a translation of the Gutachten prepared for the 69. Deutschen Juristentag to be held in September 2012. It pleads for a separate consumer law code outside private law codifications. The benchmarks are: rethinking the concept of the consumer (the vulnerable consumer and the consumer/customer), focussing beyond traditional consumer law on internet sales and on consumer services (telecom, energy, transport, financial services), integrating and developing a consistent approach to consumer law enforcement via individual and collective action, via ADR, courts and administrative bodies. The solution is seen in a movable system (bewegliches System) that allows for connecting substantive rights and remedies to the different concepts of consumers, vulnerable, confident and responsible. | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | EUI LAW | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 2012/23 | en |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.subject | Consumer protection | en |
dc.subject | European consumer law | en |
dc.subject | the notion of the consumer | en |
dc.subject | internet sales | en |
dc.subject | services | en |
dc.subject | enforcement | en |
dc.subject | remedies | en |
dc.subject | ADR and ODR | en |
dc.subject | collective remedies | en |
dc.subject | role of regulatory agencies | en |
dc.title | Do Consumers and Businesses Need a New Architecture of Consumer Law? A thought-provoking impulse | en |
dc.type | Working Paper | en |
eui.subscribe.skip | true | |